Saturday, March 31, 2018

How Are Conservative And Liberal Brains Different [Politically Incorrect!]

15 Shot dead in Gaza on Good Friday

Almost 75% of young children in Belgium’s second largest city have migrant backgrounds By VOICE OF EUROPE

An increasing number of children in Belgium’s Antwerp have migrant backgrounds. While the number of native Belgians is decreasing, the number of people with a migrant background is surging.
Statistics from the city office show that in the group of children aged between 0 and 9 years, 74.10% have migrant backgrounds. In the group aged between 10 and 19 years the number of children with Non-Belgian backgrounds is at almost 70%.
Read More:

The Face Of John Bolton By Brother Nathanael Kapner

COLD, CALLOUS, CALCULATING, with an aspect of vicious intent, the study of John Bolton’s face leaves one with a sense of edginess.
Coupling this with his pursuit of committing more war crimes by the US in pursuance of Jewry’s interests (not America’s), the study of John Bolton’s scowl proffers an emblem of America’s enslavement to Jews.
Take another look at Bolton. (The mug shots of criminals offer a happier presentation):
What do we see?
Hostility, Vengefulness, Mania, Arrogance, Nastiness, Insolence, and Cheekiness.
Through the looking glass of a matzah ball, Bolton’s quirks fit right into Jewry’s agenda.

Bolton’s hostility, for instance, will be channeled by Jews into malice toward Iran…which poses NO threat to America. Iran poses a threat to Israel for being opposed to Zionist expansion and its malignant actions toward the Palestinians.

Read More:

Le Pen: We’re watching Hungary with envy

According to Marine Le Pen, president of the National Front, France has no immigration policy, they have no control of the events, they can’t determine who they live together with, so they are watching Hungary with envy.

Read More:

Stopping harassment at Google

Well, this project sounds promising. After all, we know all about the terrible atmosphere of harassment at Google, where employees have been known to blacklist and physically threaten other Google employees on the basis of their opinions, right?
About 100 Google U.S. employees concerned about cyber bullying inside the company have organized into a group proposing new policies for conduct at the unit of Alphabet Inc, five people involved in the effort said in recent interviews.

Three current employees and two others helping to organize the group said it formed last fall. They said that among its proposals, which have not previously been reported in detail, are that Google should tighten rules of conduct for internal forums and hire staff to enforce them.

They said they want to stop inflammatory conversations and personal attacks on the forums and see punishment for individuals who regularly derail discussions or leak conversations. The group also wants Google to list rights and responsibilities for accusers, defendants, managers and investigators in human resources cases.
That sounds pretty reasonable, I have to say.
The group also desires greater protection for employees targeted by what it views as insincere complaints to human resources used as a bullying tactic and goading. The organizers said Google should be more attuned to when people seeking to stir animosity or expressing views opposite the company’s stated values try to take over discussions about race, gender and other sensitive subjects. 

Read More:

Friday, March 30, 2018

Sweden Retracts 'Utterly Crazy' Child Marriage Brochure After Public Uproar

Teddy Bear

The leaflet was commissioned by the government and included detailed instructions for people married to children covering all spheres of life, including intimacy. However, it has caused an outrage among the Swedish public, who found that it normalized such behavior instead of preventing it.
The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare has withdrawn an information brochure targeted at "new arrivals" moving to the Nordic country while married to children after it caused an uproar among politicians and ordinary Swedes alike, Swedish national broadcaster SVT reported.
The contested brochure "Information for you [who are] married to a child" starts by stressing that marrying persons under the age of 18 is prohibited in Sweden and outlining the reasons why. A separate section specifies that having sex with someone under the age of 15 is a crime, regardless of whether it happens within wedlock or not.
"Since children under the age of 15 have an absolute right to protection from sexual acts, it is improper for you to live together if the child is under 15," the brochure said.
The publication of the brochure in general and its wording in particular sparked furious criticism in Sweden.
"Its biggest shortcoming is that it fails to mention the word ‘prison,' rather it gives some advice and tips on how to respond if you have a relationship our marriage laws forbid," the leader of the Conservatives' parliamentary group Tobias Billström said.
"Facepalm. Unacceptable permissiveness. The brochure must be withdrawn without delay. Child marriage should be completely forbidden," Liberal leader Jan Björklund tweeted.
Read More:

The West Cannibalizes Itself. What civilization has ever sought to repudiate its own culture and traditions as we do today? By ROBERT W. MERRY

Some 13 European thinkers issued an intellectual protest late last year against the assault on the Western heritage that has been raging on the Continent and in Britain for years. They called their 11-page document “The Paris Statement” and gave it a title: “A Europe We Can Believe In.” The Europe they believe in, write the 13 signatories (well-known in Europe, less so in America), is under threat of destruction from the forces of globalization, multiculturalism, and the EU managerial class, as well as growing anti-Christian prejudice.
“These lands are our home,” says the Statement, “we have no other. Home is a place where things are familiar, and where we are recognized, however far we have wandered. This is the real Europe, our precious and irreplaceable civilization.”  
The Statement has received a smattering of attention in the European media—broadcast television in Poland and the Netherlands; major newspapers in Germany, France, Spain, and Poland; national weekly magazines in Poland and Hungary; and opinion web sites in the UK, Switzerland, Belgium, and Spain. But mostly it is an intellectual statement written for and consumed largely by other intellectuals.
And of course the assault on the Western heritage from within is a potent phenomenon in Europe, fostered by nearly the entire elite structure of the civilization. Thus it isn’t clear what a few highly accomplished intellectuals, however eloquent or anguished, can do to stem the erosion of the civilizational identity. But we are witnessing the emergence of some powerful political currents within the general European population, manifest in increasingly populist voting patterns in France, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere. Hence the Paris Statement could become a significant intellectual underpinning for Europeans who are increasingly concerned about the direction of things in their homeland.  
The threat to Europe, says the Statement, comes from “a false understanding” of what Europe is and represents. This “false Europe” is the product of people who are “orphans by choice,” glorifying their vision “as the forerunner of a universal community that is neither universal nor a community.” Believing that history is on their side, these patrons of the false Europe have become “haughty and disdainful, unable to acknowledge the defects in the post-national, post-cultural world they are constructing.” The false Europe, says the statement, is “utopian and tyrannical.”
Read More:

South Africa: The White Right of Return Movement — or Lack Thereof

South Africa’s (RSA) nutwing President Jacob Zuma is gone; however, in a nightmarish turn of events,  Zuma has been replaced with one Cyril Ramaphosa, who threatens to be even worse. See: New South African ‘Leader’ Moves Forward with Land Confiscation Directed Against White Farmers.
Ramaphosa recently addressed the nation’s parliament in Cape Town and spoke about the original European colonists in the 1600s taking land from the indigenous tribes. Ramaphosa called this “original sin” and stated that he wants to see “the return of the land to the people from whom it was taken … to heal the divisions of the past.”
There has been an increase of late in murders and attacks of white farmers in RSA. As is typical of any hidden ethnic cleansing, the data is convoluted and difficult to ascertain. To put this in proper perspective it appears that attacks run under a thousand a year, and murders under a hundred. However the threat of land seizure without compensation has been made by government officials including the president.
With abuses and basic rights violations against whites increasing in South Africa, the concept of “right of return” has been put forth. The alternative term is “right of abode.”Ghana has one for folks of African origin, and of course Israel is the most well known.
As it currently stands, many white South Africans who try to apply for citizenship to European countries, such as the Netherlands and U.K., are rejected outright. Many of these white South Africans seeking citizenship are direct descendants of the very same European nations that reject them. In the ultimate gesture of extreme political correctness (and hypocrisy), these same countries promote open borders for individuals (aka migrants) of non-European descent.
Read More:

Opinion Pages Don’t Reflect America by Chris Roberts

Both Left and Right agree.
Since the 2016 election, political elites and commentators have become a regular target of derision. Opinion columnists at the New York TimesWashington Post, and other legacy media have been especially mocked by America’s socialist Left, emboldened by the surprisingly strong candidacy of Sen. Bernie Sanders. Chris Lehmann, editor in chief at The Baffler, frequently writes that neoliberal elites are stifling a left-wing populist uprising. The popular socialist podcast, Chapo Trap House, dedicates entire episodes to criticizing center-right pundits such as Ross Douthat and David Brooks. Up-and-coming socialist outlets are constantly attacking center-left figureheads, hoping to push them aside. Two examples areJacobin’s criticism of the more moderate Vox, and the many attacks from the left on centrist Jonathan Chait.
All pundits across the political spectrum are wealthy and out of touch. They represent the opinions of a small minority of Americans who are just like themselves: wealthy, urban, and college-educated. Socialists are justified in mocking them. America’s best known pundits monolithically support policies that are unpopular with the general public, such as frivolous foreign interventions, corporatist free-trade deals, gun control, and mass immigration. America’s major pundits are indistinguishable from each another in that nearly all supported Hillary Clinton, hate President Trump, and write the same turgid prose. Last year, leftist writer Hamilton Nolan, published a satirical piece titled, “Seven Hundred Words of Garbage Indistinguishable from the Average Major Newspaper Column.” Here’s a sample:
Donald Trump may like meatloaf, but the “meat” of his proposals leaves much to be desired.
Take health care. Complicated? Of course. Only Donald Trump was shocked to learn that heath care is a complicated subject. Does the Republican Congressional health care bill pay due heed to the complexity of this issue? Experts say it does not. The reasons are myriad, and complicated, but suffice it to say that few of us will get through life without needing health care—and when the time comes that you need it, you will hope that it is provided to you. Without diving into the complex details, I’ll simply note that the complications that go with designing a health care law should be respected—and not disrespected, or disregarded. A complicated issue deserves a careful look. Sadly, Republicans in Congress have not given us that. And that is what we deserve, as Americans.
Was Mr. Nolan imitating Thomas Friedman, David Brooks, or Gail Collins? One cannot be sure . . . which is the point.
If newspapers wanted accurately to reflect popular American views, their op-ed line-up would include nationalists, isolationists, and race realists. Consider that when asked by a pollster, “On average, blacks have worse jobs, income and housing than white people. Do you think those differences are because most just don’t have the motivation or willpower to pull themselves up out of poverty?” 55 percent of white Republicans and 26 percent of white Democrats said “yes.” That means around one-third of voters agree with the statement, but you can’t find a single pundit who does. When it comes to building a border wall with Mexico, around 37 percent of Americans support it. But the only pundits who do are conservatives such as Pat BuchananMichelle Malkin, and Ann Coulter. The number of columnists at the Wall Street JournalNew York Times, and Washington Post who support the border wall is certainly less than one-third—it may even be zero.
Read More:

Thursday, March 29, 2018

Black Lives Matter? Black Peace Activist Shot By Fellow Blacks in 65% Black Memphis

Black. Lives. Matter. 

End of story, right? 

When people lack impulse control, a sense of future-time orientation and have higher rates of testosterone (aggression: see lack of impulse control), it doesn't matter if they have access to guns or not; whatever weapon they can procure will be sufficient for inflicting maximum carnage. 

Even upon a black peace activist, who is a participant in the "Ride of Tears" anti-gun violence organization.

The black males who shot her didn't care about her civic mindfulness and desire to prove 'Black Lives Matter'.

Guns aren't killing Memphis.

Guns aren't the reason police form an army around heavily trafficked tourist areas in the city.

Blacks are killing Memphis.

Read More: SBPDL: Black Lives Matter? Black Peace Activist Shot By F...:

A Case for Jewish-controlled MSM as Hate News or Ministry of Hate

The MSM has been called lots of things. Recently, the media have been mocked and ridiculed as ‘Fake News’ in light of all their lies & propaganda, conspiracy theorizing(about Russia Hacking), utter bias(in favor of Democrats), and spinning stories to fit the Narrative of PC rule-book compiled by Jews, Homos, and their cuck minions. But lies and BS aren’t as bad as what they are used for. After all, a lie is just a lie where as libel is more than just a lie. It is a mendacious attempt to smear someone’s good reputation. And if most lies are harmless, lies that lead to war and the deaths or suffering of millions are acts of evil. This is why it’s so important that the News Media remain objective(or try to be as much as possible), tell the real news in accordance to facts, and provide the proper context in which an incident or event has taken place. Especially in a democracy, we are supposed to trust the media because editors and journalists in a free nation are supposed to be committed to the truth without fear or favor. Now, if they want to dish out opinions, they can do so in the editorial pages, but the Core News must be based on objective facts and in a language that isn’t loaded with ideological bias -- consider a bogus term like 'homophobia' that implies anyone critical of homo culture is clinically sick in the head.

But we don’t have that kind of media, and in a way, the notion of ‘liberal democracy’ blinds us to the real nature of oligopolistic control of most of news and info. Now, even the much debased media in the West are still freer than most news in Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, China, and etc. But More Free doesn’t mean Truly Free, let alone truly honest. After all, if one person murdered ten people while another person killed five, the latter is less of a murderer than the former, BUT he too is a murderer than an innocent person. So, while the so-called Western Media are freer and more honest than outright propaganda organs in dictatorships where the state effectively controls or censors all media, we have to keep in mind that most of the media in the West are essentially Information Fiefdoms than Oases of freedom, courage, and honesty.

The Mass Media are expensive operations and can only be owned and controlled by those with Big Money. As such, they are more like Hollywood than missions devoted to truth and integrity. They are about stars and ratings, advertising dollars and big salaries. There is also ethno-monopoly of the media, especially troubling because the dominant Jews are only 2% of the population and filled with supremacist chutzpah against goyim around the world. Another pernicious myth we must bust is the notion of the journalist as a courageous truth-seeker who is willing to risk life and limb to get the truth. While there are indeed journalists like that, most members of the community are careerists with degrees from fancy colleges where the Narrative is favored over the Truth. Because most journalists are career-than-courage-minded, they will not upset the apple cart and risk being fired. If even a distinguished veteran journalist like Helen Thomas could be fired just like that, imagine what could happen to journalists on the bottom? Also, because most young journalists were trained under PC regimen, they see their main job as suppressing and snuffing out certain voices and views that run counter to the Jewish-controlled PC narrative. So, if there’s a honest critic of Jewish Power, these so-called journalists act like the Stasi and report on such people only to ‘dox’ them and get them fired from jobs. Journalism today is less about protecting one’s sources than outing people who disobey the Narrative so as to earn pokemon points to move up the careerist ladder. As so many journalist are Jewish, trained by Jewish professors or their cuck-collaborators, or seek favors from Jewish bosses — like US politicians suck up to their Jewish donors — , they play by the dominant rule-book without asking further questions. So, when it comes to White National Liberationists, all these journalists mostly ignore everything and just consult ADL(a Zionist Supremacist organization) and SPLC(an organization mainly funded by supremacist Jews). So, we have a Jew-run media ordering its Jewish-trained journalists to consult the ADL-SPLC handbook on what-is-what on certain hot-button issues. Jews are very incestuous in their use of power. It’s like Facebook and Youtube, both owned by Jews, hired ADL to shut down many pro-Palestinian and BDS voices. Jewish oligarchs conspire with Jewish supremacist activists to shut down views that run counter to the Zionist Narrative. There is a reason why the Jewish-controlled media especially target BDS & Palestinian National Liberationists and Alt Right & White National Liberationists. In order for Jewish Supremacism to remain in business, the national aspirations of gentiles must be crushed. So, whether it’s West Bank or the West in general, Jewish supremacist-imperialists seek to crush the dream of national liberation and emancipation of gentiles.

Read More:

Hate-speech laws help only the powerful

Hate-speech laws help only the powerful

YouTube comedian Mark Meechan has been convicted of grossly offensive behaviour under the Communications Act. Meechan’s crime was filming his girlfriend’s dog raising its paw as he made pro-Nazi comments. Under the YouTube username of ‘Count Dankula’, he posted this joke video on the internet, and it was then viewed over three million times. This week, Airdrie Sheriff Court found Meechan guilty, and he now faces potential imprisonment.

Talking to the press after the judgement, Meechan said ‘today, context and intent were completely disregarded’. He explained during the trial that he was not a Nazi and that he had posted the video to annoy his girlfriend. Sheriff Derek O’Carroll declared the video ‘anti-Semitic and racist’ in nature. He added that ‘the accused knew that the material was offensive and knew why it was offensive’. The original investigation was launched following zero complaints from the public. Offensiveness apparently depends on the sensitivity of police officers and judges.

Offensive behaviour is one of the crimes of immorality, such as offence against public morality, action against the state, counter-revolutionary activity and other catch-all terms, that have always been used to suppress dissent (reasonable and unreasonable). In other words, ‘hate speech’ laws are no different to those laws that we snigger at as blatant attempts by governments of other countries, past and present, to control their subjects. Yet we permit such laws to be passed in our own country.

Laws against speech which are advanced under the guise of defending the weak are actually designed to protect the dominant elite. Laws against harassment, threats of violence, incitement to commit crime, and so forth, are all already on the statute. They protect all people equally. Hate crimes are different. They are crimes against public morality, as defined by lawmakers. The offences are crafted not to protect ‘marginalised groups’ but to demonstrate the virtue of the ruling class and to demonstrate its power. They use minorities as shields to protect their own interests. 

Christianity, patriotism, monarchy and the family were once society-wide emblems of the moral consensus. But as they were diminished by a new multiculturalism, a crisis of values developed. With so many differing perspectives and traditions at play in society, it became hard to find moral totems around which the nation could gather. One unifying idea today is that racism is wrong. It is a moral value that appeals broadly to liberals and conservatives, relying on the innate human moral values of fairness, and individuals being treated according to their actions.

Read More:

Nicolas Sarkozy: Crime and Punishment?

Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy is under investigation for allegedly receiving millions of euros in illegal election campaign funding from Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. This must be placed in the broader context of war crimes by Western heads of state, Gilbert Doctorow explains.
By Gilbert Doctorow
The relationship between Sarkozy and Gaddafi fits the pattern of the old mafia joke: “You’re my friend. I kill you for nothing.”
Two news items jostled for attention on the front pages of mainstream newspapers and news bulletins of the main television channels on the Old Continent last week. One was the Sergei Skripal “nerve agent attack” and Theresa May’s attempts to find support among EU leaders for a common stand against Russia as perpetrator. The other was the arrest and questioning of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy over allegations that he took 50 million euros in cash from Libyan leader Muamar Gaddafi in 2007 for the election campaign that won him the presidency.

The Skripal story of “the Russians did it” had its day in court in Brussels on Thursday and Friday during the summit of EU leaders at the European Council, the EU’s chief executive body. The deliberations ended in verbal support for May: the EU said it was recalling its ambassador to Moscow for four weeks of consultations. As EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker explained at a press conference, however, the EU faces important challenges which require active coordination with Russia, so channels of communication must remain open.
But then on Monday, Germany, Poland and France expelled four Russian diplomats; the Czech Republic and Lithuania expelled three; Denmark, Italy, and The Netherlands two apiece; and one each from Latvia, Estonia, Romania, Finland, Sweden and Ireland. (The U.S. topped them all with 60 Russian diplomats expelled and the closing of Russia’s Seattle consulate, further undermining the Democratic Party narrative that President Donald Trump is a Russia “puppet.”) On Tuesday, NATO kicked out 13 Russians, further weakening the safety net protecting against East-West conflict.

Read More:

How Iraq War Destabilized the World and Why The Neocons Aren’t Finished Yet

The Iraq War architects have been thoroughly rehabilitated and are planning their next adventure, even as the catastrophic ramifications of their crimes continue to reverberate around the world.
Last week marked the 15th anniversary of the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. April 9 will be the 15th anniversary of the fall of Baghdad. The consequences of these events are still playing out today, from Mali to Niger, to the Philippines. Iraq has never recovered and is only beginning to emerge from the trauma, while American officials plan the next military adventure.
Writing in the New York Times, Iraqi novelist Sinan Antoon observed:
“The invasion of Iraq is often spoken of in the United States as a ‘blunder,’ or even a ‘colossal mistake.’ It was a crime. Those who perpetrated it are still at large. Some of them have even been rehabilitated thanks to the horrors of Trumpism and a mostly amnesiac citizenry.”
The rehabilitation of the neocons
Indeed, the rise of Trump has provided the cabal of Iraq War architects with a rebranding opportunity. After their utter failure in Iraq, these people were largely disgraced and no longer taken seriously outside of right-wing circles. But Trumpism, and the desire of liberals to oust the current president, has led to an anti-Trump coalition which includes at its helm many of the instrumental figures behind the Iraq invasion. The list includes David “axis of evil”Frum, former speechwriter to President George W. Bush and now a senior editor at the Atlantic, as well as neoconservative think tanker Bill Kristol, andGeorge W. Bush, who is now celebrated as a pragmatic leader – even by nostalgic Democrats who contrast him with Trump. 

Read More:

This Week on the Alt Right | Tommy Robinson BANNED from Twitter!!

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Diversity for thee, but not for me

Reich's Laboratory - Steve Sailer

Perhaps Tom Buchanan, Jay Gatsby’s rival for Daisy’s affections, wasn’t totally wrong after all?
Countless articles about how unscientifically racist old WASPs were begin by quoting the scene early in The Great Gatsby in which Daisy’s oafish husband, Tom, recommends a book called The Rise of the Colored Empires.
Ironically, F. Scott Fitzgerald was parodying his own regrettable views on race. For instance, in 1921 the great novelist wrote to critic Edmund Wilson of his disgust engendered by a visit to Europe in language that sounds like Tom Buchanan waxing poetic: “The negroid streak creeps northward to defile the Nordic race. Already the Italians have the souls of blackamoors.”
Since about the stock market crash of 1929, this kind of thinking has been terribly out of fashion.
Since then, an endless stream of anthropologists have assured us that race is just a social construct, that ancient peoples made pots not war, that Aryan conquests in India and Europe were Nazi delusions, that the caste system was imposed on the egalitarian Indians by British colonialists, and many other agreeable suppositions.
As Fitzgerald’s friend Hemingway ended The Sun Also Rises, “Isn’t it pretty to think so?”
But now the brilliant Harvard geneticist David Reich has published a bombshell scientific book, Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past, whose revelations would have been found congenial by a smarter version of Buchanan (such as Fitzgerald himself).
Despite Reich’s occasional need to stop his otherwise lucid narrative to spew irrational rage against his fellow race-science heretics such as James D. Watson, the genome expert conclusively demolishes the post-Boasian anthropologists’ conventional wisdom.
Read More:

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

David Hogg, Crisis Actor, forgets his lines

That sound you heard was the sound of the media's narrative balloon popping. It turns out that David "Camera" Hogg, who totally is not a crisis actor and absolutely does not play a student who survived a mass shooting at his school in Florida:
First take: On the day of the shooting, I got my camera and got on my bike and rode as fast as I could three miles from my house to the school to get as much video and to get as many interviews as I could because I knew that this could not be another mass shooting.
Second take: When Hogg heard a “pop” while sitting in an AP environmental science class around 2:30 p.m. Wednesday, he told his teacher it sounded strangely like a gunshot. But there had been a fire drill that very morning and talk of a “Code Red” exercise to prepare for an active shooter. This must just be a surprise drill, he reasoned. And then the fire alarm sounded. Dutifully acting on it, Hogg and other students tried to exit the building. A janitor—Hogg doesn’t know his name but calls him an angel—knew where the shots were coming from and sent the students back. Then a culinary arts teacher, Ashley Kurth, pulled Hogg and others inside, locked the door, and made them hide in a closet. Checking Twitter and Instagram, Hogg—who’s an editor at the school’s TV station—found the news that the shooting was real and ongoing.
When Camera Hogg says that he isn't a crisis actor, it's entirely possible that he's telling the truth. Because he is so haplessly bad at it that it wouldn't surprise me if he's been fired from the job.

Face it, the whole thing is fake. Again. The Parkland drama was just another obvious false flag meant to drum up public support for gun control, complete with fake survivors who weren't even on the scene at the time. That's why Big Social and the mainstream media reacted so strongly to the correct observations that these kids are fakes and crisis actors, because they are desperate to retain their ability to create a false narrative.

Read More:

Count Dankula, Free Speech and the Police State #FreeDankula


Atlanta Police will no longer respond to some shoplifting calls

 - The Atlanta Chief of Police said her officers will no longer respond to shoplifting calls at stores in Buckhead.
Erika Shields said staff shortages, in excess of 300 officers, has forced her to reevaluate how to deploy officers. In the affluent section north of downtown, Shields said, the APD Zone Two officers frequently get calls from merchants to do a report on a shoplifter who has been caught by store security. After filling out the paperwork, the officer then must arrange a transport to the Atlanta City Jail in downtown.
All that can take up to an hour and a half to complete. The chief believes that time can be better spent by having those officers handle serious crimes, from burglaries to carjackings.
Read More:

Lawsuit: 100,000 noncitizens registered to vote in Pennsylvania

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is accompanied by Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney, left, Sen. Bob Casey D-Pa., Gov. Tom Wolf, and former President Bill Clinton, stands on stage at her presidential primary election night rally, Tuesday, April 26, 2016, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
More than 100,000 noncitizens are registered to vote in Pennsylvania alone, according to testimony submitted Monday in a lawsuit demanding the state come clean about the extent of its problems.
The Public Interest Legal Foundation, which has identified similar noncitizen voting problems in studies of Virginia and New Jersey, said Pennsylvania officials have admitted noncitizens have been registering and voting in the state “for decades.”
But state officials have stonewalled PILF requests for access to the data that could expose the problem, the group says in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Harrisburg.
“For months, Pennsylvania bureaucrats have concealed facts about noncitizens registering and voting — that ends today,” PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said.
He said Pennsylvania had already admitted to a “glitch” dating back to the 1990s that had allowed noncitizens applying to renew driver’s licenses to be offered the chance to register to vote. Mr. Adams said he now wants to find out how bad the problem is overall.
Pennsylvania officials wouldn’t respond to the lawsuit, nor to the 100,000 noncitizen number.
“We’re not going to comment on anything related to litigation,” said Wanda Murren, director of communications and press at the Pennsylvania Department of State.
The 100,000 number cited in the lawsuit comes from testimony given by Philadelphia Commissioner Al Schmidt, who revealed the glitch in the state motor vehicle bureau’s systems that prompted noncitizens to register to vote.
Mr. Schmidt didn’t respond to an email seeking comment.
While Pennsylvania refused PILF record requests, the group did manage to obtain data from some counties, and found several curious cases.
One man, Felipe Rojas-Orta, canceled his registration last year, filing a handwritten note saying he was not a citizen. He had, however, registered as a Democrat and voted in three separate elections, including most recently 2016, the year of the presidential race.
A woman had her registration canceled in 2006 as a noncitizen, yet re-registered to vote twice — and cast ballots in some elections. That woman, a registered Democrat, is still active in the system, the lawsuit says.
Yet another woman voted in 2008 and 2012, had her registration canceled in 2014 because she wasn’t a citizen, then reregistered and voted in 2016, according to documents filed in court. She was registered as a Democrat.
The federal “motor-voter” law requires states to make voter registration available at motor vehicle bureaus, but also pushes states to try to keep their voter rolls clean. Under the law, private parties can sue to press states to perform the cleansing.
Pennsylvania officials repeatedly refused requests under the law, according to the lawsuit. The state would only let the PILF look at records related to voters stripped from the rolls because of death or change of residence.
The PILF says that’s a misreading of the law.
The group has released reports in the past detailing more than 1,000 noncitizens registered to vote in New Jersey and more than 5,500 registered in Virginia. Roughly a third of those from Virginia actually cast ballots.
The numbers only include people whose registration was canceled because they later said they weren’t citizens, and thus ineligible to vote. Analysts say it’s difficult to figure out how many others are registered but never discovered because they don’t self-report.
President Trump’s voter integrity commission was supposed to try to get a broader handle on that question by checking voter rolls against government databases. But Mr. Trump disbanded the commission amid a series of lawsuits and questions over the panel’s activities.
Read More:

Monday, March 26, 2018

Trump Assailed for Phoning Putin, But Feting Blood-soaked Saudi Dictator is OK

March 23, 2018 Donald Trump sparked outrage this week in the US over his congratulatory phone call to Russian leader Vladimir Putin on his re-election. But his obscene indulgence of a Saudi despot in the White House hardly ruffled any concern.

How disconnected from reality can you get?

There was furious reaction across US media to news that Trump phoned Russia’s President Putin to congratulate him on his landslide election victory last weekend. Republicans and Democrats were up in arms about what is just basic protocol of one leader calling another to express customary election compliments.
After all, former president Barack Obama did the same when Putin won the previous 2012 presidential election.

This time, however, US-Russian relations have become toxic after a raft of unproven allegations against Moscow, including alleged meddling in the American presidential vote in November 2016 in which Trump was elected, and the latest row over the poisoning of a former Russian double agent in England.

All these anti-Russian claims are unsubstantiated, if not outlandish, but they are repeated often enough to cast a permanent cloud over international relations. Republican Senator John McCain was widely quoted by way of expressing the bipartisan outrage over Trump’s phone call. “An American president does not lead the free world by congratulating dictators,” he said.

American critics of Russia’s Putin can quibble all they like about the merits of his re-election. They contend the vote was a foregone conclusion, rigged in his favor. But such sniping seems churlish against the overwhelming fact that Putin was supported by a huge majority of voters – nearly 77 percent.
In any case, another way of looking at this outpouring of American bile is to enquire just how credible are the detractors?

Read More:

Defend Free Speech by Waging War on the HATE SPEECH of Globalists & the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) - Playing Defense on Free Speech Isn’t Enough; Patriots must wage war on the Hateful Speech of the Other Side; Only Thus can the Patriots gain Moral Momentum

When it comes to 'hate speech' and censorship, it is no longer enough for White National Liberationists to play defense. 

Use Judo against Judea. In Judo, you use the force of your enemy against your enemy. If he pushes, you pull and pivot. If he pulls, you push and pivot. And it is time the Alt Right began a campaign to shut down Hate Speech of the Globalists, Homomaniacs, Afro-supremacists, self-hating white cuck collaborators, pornographers, and the Empire of Judea(EOJ), the most powerful power in the world. 

If the GLOB(globalist supremacists) want to talk about HATE SPEECH, okay, we are game. Let us wage war on Hate Speech. Let us ban Hate Speech. And let the Alt Right lead the movement to identify and shut down globalist hate. The GLOB wants to burn our books? We should call out to burn their books, magazines, documents, CD's and idols. 

As for organizations like Hope-Not-Hate and dorks like Patrick Hermansson, they practice something worse than Hate Speech. They indulge in Craven Speech, Cowardly Speech, Cuck Speech, Programmed Speech(as brainwashed useful idiots), Paid Speech or Bought Speech(as opportunistic shabbos goy water-carriers of EOJ), Submissive Speech(as they worship globalists as gods), Permitted Speech(as they dare not step outside the perimeters of what is allowed by the globalist Empire of Judea), and Fake Speech(of the Jew-run Big Media that spread lies about WMD to destroy Iraq, lies about Gaddafi to destroy Libya, lies about Ukraine to pull off a coup using Neo-Nazi paramilitary, lies about Russia to paralyze working relations between US and Russia under Trump),and lies about Alt Right to keep people in the dark about the supremacism of EOJ.

Read More:

Colin Flaherty Compilation - Volume 2 [1/10/2018 - 1/12/2018]

The Killing of the American White Male by Dwight Longenecker

Why are so many American white men killing themselves and others? And what’s to be done about this phenomenon?…

Not long ago I was traveling back from a speaking engagement when I pulled into a Waffle House for breakfast. Waffle House is usually populated by working-class men at that time of morning, and this day was no exception. The exception was that I was joined at the counter by a well dressed, middle-aged white woman. Somehow we got involved in a conversation about how unhealthy my breakfast was.
She smiled and said, “Judging from your appearance, you are far more likely, statistically speaking, to die not from too many bacon-and-egg breakfasts, but from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.”
After choking on my coffee, I discovered that she was a psychiatrist who worked with families of suicide cases. It was from her that I first learned about the epidemic of suicide among the white male population in the USA.
When there is an epidemic of violence that targets a particular racial, ethnic, or age group, our media and the voices in our society usually erupt in compassion, concern, and outrage. However, there is an epidemic of violent deaths happening every week in America from which we turn our heads and look away.
It is the unpredictable, irrational anarchy of suicide among white men. The statistics are undeniable: The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention reports that there are nearly 45,000 deaths by suicide each year, and that this number is most likely inaccurate because of under-reporting due to the stigma of suicide. Over the last decade, the rate of suicides has climbed steadily and seven out of ten who take their lives are white men—most of them between the ages of twenty-five and sixty-five.
Read More:

Patrick Casey: American Identitarianism | Leading Our People Forward 2018

March 25, 2018 - Bolton Appointment, Cambridge Analytica, Russian Election

Sunday, March 25, 2018

Top Books For Men To Read [Top 10 Best Books For Men]

The Ugly Truth About The March For Our Lives



Boomer 60s rocker Neil Young, who is now 72, has launched an astounding attack on President Trump in a recent interview with the Daily Beast. The Canadian musician called Trump a "lowlife" and an "animal," and blamed him for what he describes as the chaotic situation of America.
"I don’t see how it can go on," Young moaned. "The man—Trump, the president of the United States—is a mess. He has no balls. He hasn’t got one ball. He literally has nothing. All the bravado, all the you’re fired, you’re fired, all that shit, he doesn’t have the balls to look anybody in the face and tell them anything."
In addition to speculating on Trump's testicular status, he also blamed Trump for harming the environment, and then appeared to call for Trump's assassination:
"That’s my biggest problem with Trump. None of this other shit matters as much. He is an animal. He’s got to go. But you know, the system will take care of him. What a lowlife. No respect for that guy. Every day when I look at the news, I’m hoping somehow he’s gone. That’s the story I’m looking for. I don’t care how it happens. I wouldn’t wish any ill on anybody, but I’d just like to see him out of that office."
Read More:

Over 40 children among missing in fire at shopping mall in Kemerovo - source More:

MOSCOW, March 26. /TASS/. Over 40 children are reported to be among 64 people missing in a fire at a shopping mall in Russia’s Siberian city of Kemerovo, a source in the local emergencies headquarters said.

"According to the information at the moment, 41 children are among those missing in the fire and inquired by their relatives," the source said.

The fire at the Zimnyaya Vishnya (Winter Cherry) shopping mall in central Kemerovo erupted on Sunday on the top fourth floor engulfing an area of some 1,500 square meters.

Read More:

Give a white man a pile of bricks, he'll build a city; give a black man a city, he'll turn it into a pile of bricks

Well... it's true what they say about Bell Curve City

Give a white man a pile of bricks, he'll build a city; give a black man a city, he'll turn it into a pile of bricks...[Amid drumbeat from falling bricks, St. Louis to ramp up demolition of vacant buildings, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 3-24-18]:

ST. LOUIS • A chimney top set sail one night from a historic building in the 1900 block of Bremen Avenue and crash-landed with a solid thud. 
The three-story vacant building also rains insulation, rock tiles and bricks, said Rhonda Spencer, who has rented a home next door since 2010. She described a range of drumbeat sounds from the cascade of debris in the area.
As western civilization crumbles under the stewardship of Africans in America,  memories of a better yesterday are reflected back amid the horrors of tomorrow
Pointing across Hyde Park from her front doorstep, she said a roof collapse rumbled like a thunderclap. And a corner building roared when it smashed into the road. 
“This one sounded like an explosion,” said Spencer, 37. 
Thousands of crumbling buildings like these are reminders that St. Louis is a shell of what it once was, particularly on the North Side. Population has fallen to about 309,000 today from nearly 857,000 in 1950. 
Because bricks last so long, rebuilding often seems like a possibility; however, the city’s list of vacant structures has nearly doubled since the Great Recession ended in 2009. 
City officials said that there were 7,100 vacant buildings and that 4,000 of them should be razed for not being structurally sound. They expect to soon have $3 million over the next fiscal year, an increase from $2 million currently, to speed up demolitions. That amount does not include millions of dollars the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District is spending to clear abandoned buildings for green space and private investors.

Read More:

Polish Woman Hoped for Peaceful Life in Sweden; But Was Raped by Arabs and Ignored by Police

It’s been a year since two young Arabs raped Agnieszka Wiśniewska in Sweden. She now has decided to tell her story. She says the police did not even attempt to solve the case and she had to wait 11 months for a psychologist to help her overcome the trauma.
Agnieszka Wiśniewska says she came to Sweden in 2007 because she wanted to live peacefully. She had read in the newspapers that Sweden was a great country for families with children.
“It was just a day like every day: shopping, returning home with a bag of bread and food for the cats. It was dark as I neared home. There were two men near my house. I felt threatened. So many women are afraid to go out in the evenings now; this feeling seemed quite real. It was like this: these men passed by me, then they grabbed my jacket and pulled me into the forest . . . and the whole situation began,” she said.She immigrated, found a job, learned English, and was leading a normal life in Stockholm until the day of the crime.