Wednesday, February 28, 2018


Though perpetually “not ready for primetime”, some longwinded remarks from the other night at the esteemed PA World and Times have been elevated into an OP for further comment.  Our gratitude as ever to the esteemed proprietor.
Those remarks were made in perhaps a somewhat pessimistic humor for yours truly, but tonight I have reminded myself that The Wall prototypes are under official testing, the Nightmarers are still unamnestied, and in so many other ways our world today is considerably different for the better than it ever conceivably could have been under any other 2015 hopeful to occupy this White House.
Still, indignation remains vehement at the unlawful hurdles, the mendacious lies, and the outright godless conspiracies raised to defraud the public out of not only their chosen Administration but their historic freedoms.  Oh what a blessing if only someone can expose the wretched Pied Piper, Boss J. David Hogg for what he really is!
In the meantime, I continue to pitch for the entertainment and educational value of Godard’s La Chinoise, a stringent yet very funny (at least from my vantage-point) look at Parisian bourgeois Maoist extremism on the cusp of the attempted revolution of 1968.  Starring Godard’s teenage bride (who had already spurned proposals from rival mega-auteur Robert Bresson), it’s an inventive Pop Art headtrip inside the mindset of Antifa-style homicidal extremism, perhaps more instructional today than it could have even been intended at the time.
Read More:

The People and Organizations Leading the Gun Control Campaign by James Edwards

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald
In Cooper Sterling’s article for The Occidental Observer (“Guns, Profiling and White Males“), he notes:
The Left’s irrational obsession with gun control goes beyond the latest mass shooting. It is endemic among the cosmopolitan literati, who loathe Middle America, to dwell on the risks associated with firearms while disregarding or minimizing the benefits of firearm ownership.
Anyone monitoring the national scene since Newtown is witnessing an emotional antipathy toward the last trace of political leverage among an identifiable demographic: an overwhelmingly White male gun culture. What the MSM and gun control advocates ultimately detest is the gun culture in America, which is too White, too male, and too conservative.
The tradition of gun ownership is as old as the Republic. It reflects the pre-1965 demographic of America as an overwhelmingly White — and more civilized — nation. As a native Midwesterner, guns were rampant in our neighborhoods where few homes didn’t have some sort of firearm. We came of age hunting with our fathers, uncles and cousins, acquiring rifles and shotguns in our mid-teens.
An article from The Forward notes that the Jewish community has taken the lead in gun control and that part of it is hostility toward the gun culture of White America that is especially apparent in rural White America. Jews “instinctively recoil” from this culture.
Jewish organizations pride themselves on gun control stances that date back to the early days of the debate, following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and of President Kennedy. Most played a supportive role in passing legislation then limiting access to weapons, and have since reaffirmed their commitment to reducing the availability of guns.
One reason for broad Jewish support of gun control, Mariaschin said, has to do with the community’s sense of security, “which perhaps leads us to feel that the possession of assault weapons is completely unneeded.”
Rabbi Eric Yoffie, former head of the Reform movement, listed in a recent Haaretz article several reasons for Jews siding with supporters of gun control: the community’s affiliation with the Democratic Party; the fact that Jews are urban people and detached from the culture of hunting or gun ownership, and suspicion toward the NRA, which is “associated in the minds of many Jews with extremist positions that frighten Jews and from which they instinctively recoil.”
Although Jews certainly attacked and eventually overcame the elite WASP culture of pre-1965 America (e.g., by displacing WASPs at elite universities), another critical point of conflict between Jewish organizations and the main Jewish intellectual movements has been with rural America. This conflict can be most clearly seen among the New York Intellectuals, a group that is discussed in Chapter 6 of The Culture of Critique.
Read More:

Dick's Sporting Goods to stop selling assault-style rifles

Dick's store
Dick's Sporting Goods will stop selling assault-style rifles, end the sale of high-capacity magazines, and stop selling guns to customers under the age of 21, CEO Ed Stack said in a Wednesday interview with ABC's Good Morning America.
“When we saw what happened in Parkland, we were so disturbed and upset … We love these kids and their rallying cry, ‘enough is enough.’ It got to us … We’re going to take a stand and step up and tell people our view and, hopefully, bring people along into the conversation.”
— Stack to the N.Y. Times
One thing to watch with companies cutting gun ties is how long it lasts, Axios' Dan Primack notes. After Sandy Hook, for example, Dick's Sporting Goods pulled assault-style rifles from its shelves. But a few months later they re-appeared at the company's outdoor and hunting retail chain, Field & Stream.
Read More:

My Youtube Channel has Been Terminated…for Exposing Disinformation

Read More:

Greatest Films of the 1980s

Platinum List: 

Once Upon a Time in America
The Shining
Blade Runner
Full Metal Jacket
Time of the Gypsies
Makioka Sisters
Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence
To Live and Die in L.A.
Raging Bull
When Father Was Away on Business
House of Games
Midnight Run
Laputa: Castle in the Sky
Something Wild
The Flight of the Eagle
Das Boot
Sans Soleil
Prince of the City
The Draughtsman's Contract 

For Full List:

Vincent Foxx - Film & Expose Your Marxist Professor

Are We Doomed? - Steve Sailer

What if the world isn’t about to blow up? What if most everything is slowly getting better and better? Would there be nothing to worry about then?
The new book by Harvard cognitive scientist Steven Pinker, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress, documents, using 75 well-crafted graphs, how life has gotten better in a host of realms.
Pinker is perhaps the finest public intellectual of our time, yet his prose style remains immensely accessible. (I detect hints of Dave Barry.)
Consider airliner safety. During the month of August 1985, when I was flying frequently on business, three commercial jet airliners crashed, killing 712 people. In contrast, in the entire year of 2017, there was not a single fatal commercial jet airliner crash anywhere in the world.
This trend didn’t happen automatically or effortlessly. Guys like my father, an engineer at Lockheed from the 1930s to the 1980s, put a lot of sweat into making planes safer. And when they failed, they had to walk the crash sites picking up broken pieces of the plane (and of the passengers).
Fortunately, we don’t have too many vested interests on the side of airplane crashes. Even so, it took until 1975 for Congress to make the National Transportation Safety Board independent of the Department of Transportation so that its reviews of each plane crash were not fettered by the need to cover up politically embarrassing mistakes.
In contrast, the recent school shooting in Broward County by a blatantly scary youth who should have had a record a mile long followed a half-dozen-year-long scheme among local and Obama Administration officials to reduce arrests of black and Hispanic teens in the name of racial and ethnic equality. Unlike with plane crashes, there remains intense political pressure to keep this history hushed up, even though Broward officials had boasted about their plan in the past.
Read More:

Putin: The Man Who Stopped Washington's Regime Change Rampage by MIKE WHITNEY

Despite Russia’s efforts to assist the US in its War On Terror, Washington has continued to regard Putin as an emerging rival that would eventually have to be confronted. The conflict in Ukraine added more gas to the fire by pitting the two superpowers against each other in a hot war that remains unresolved to this day.
But Syria was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Russia’s intervention in the Syrian War in September 2015 proved to be the turning point in the 7 year-long conflagration. By rolling back the CIA-trained militants, Putin bloodied Washington’s nose and forced the Pentagon to adopt a backup plan that relied heavily on Kurdish proxies east of the Euphrates. At present, US Special Forces and their allies are clinging to a strip of arid wasteland in the Syrian outback hoping that the Pentagon brass can settle on a forward-operating strategy that reverses their fortunes or brings the war to a swift end.
The Syria humiliation precipitated the Russia-gate Information Operation (IO) which is the propaganda component of the current war on Russia. The scandal has been an effective way to poison public perceptions and to make it look like the perpetrator of aggression is really the victim. More important, failure in Syria has led to a reevaluation of how Washington conducts its wars abroad. The War on Terror pretext has been jettisoned for a more direct approach laid out in the Trump administration’s National Defense Strategy. The focus going forward will be on “Great Power Competition”, that is, the US is subordinating its covert proxy operations to more flagrant displays of military force particularly in regards to the “growing threat from revisionist powers”, Russia and China. In short, the gloves are coming off and Washington is ramping up for a land war.
Putin has become an obstacle to Washington’s imperial ambitions which is why he’s has been elevated to Public Enemy Number 1. It has nothing to do with the fictitious meddling in the 2016 elections or the nonsensical “rolling back democracy” in Russia. It’s all about power. In the United States the group with the tightest grip on power is the foreign policy establishment. These are the towering mandarins who dictate the policy, tailor the politics to fit their strategic vision, and dispatch their lackeys in the media to shape the narrative. These are the people who decided that Putin must be demonized to pave the way for more foreign interventions, more regime change wars, more bloody aggression against sovereign states.

Read More:

Sunday, February 25, 2018

When America Loves Only the Winner

This is first hand account of what ills about the fabric of American society.

Read More:

Proposed ‘Domestic Terrorism’ Law Targets White Advocates by Gregory Hood

Aim is to prevent demonstrations like “Unite the Right.”
Writing about the establishment of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1820, “This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind, for here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate error as long as reason is left free to combat it.” Less than two centuries later, a demonstration in Charlottesville is being used to justify a crackdown on free speech, under the guise of preventing terrorism.
Virginia House Bill No. 1601 calls for the state of Virginia to create an official list of “domestic terrorist organizations,” defined as any “group of three or more persons, whether formal or informal, which has an identifiable name or identifying sign of symbol” and which either has as one of its “primary objectives” the commission of an act of domestic terrorism or “whose members individually or collectively have engaged in the commission of, attempt to commit, conspiracy to commit, or solicitation of two or more acts domestic terrorism . . . .”
It defines domestic terrorism as a violent act that aims to intimidate or instill fear in someone because of their race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation or disability, or to stop a person from pursuing their constitutional rights. It goes further to provide that giving aid to such groups or simply meeting with members to further certain objectives could meet with stiff prison sentences—true guilt by association.
The bill was introduced by Delegate Marcia Price (who wants to be called “Cia”) of Virginia’s 95th District. She is the daughter of Newport News Mayor MicKinley Price and niece of Congressman Bobby Scott. Delegate Price once worked for the NAACP, started the “Virginia Black Leadership Organizing Collaborative” and was state chair for the successful Ralph Northam campaign. Her career shows the permeable boundaries between black identity politics, non-governmental organizations, and the modern Democrat party.
The head of the Fairfax County NAACP, Kofi Annan, explained that had the bill been law, itcould have prevented last August’s “Unite the Right” rally by banning the organizations that took part. “These groups went there, armed, with the intention of terrorizing the neighborhood,” Mr. Annan said, adding, “These groups often don’t get labeled ‘terrorists,’ they get labeled ‘hate groups,’ which is more protected, under the Constitution.”
Read More:

EU silent on impending “political chaos” in South Africa

A pro-Brexit MEP has accused the European Union of shutting down debate on the political instability in South Africa, warning the country could “descend into chaos” after the 2019 general elections.
South East England MEP Janice Atkinson says due to the legacy of Nelson Mandela it has become “ideologically impossible” to question the future of the Rainbow Nation, including its human rights abuses and the lack of rule of law. Back in November, on returning from a trip to South Africa, Janice formally requested the European Parliament debate the human rights atrocities and political situation in a country which is just 15 months away from going to the polls.
“It was declined,” the co-chair of the Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF) group tells Shy Society. “I turned to my colleagues and said: ‘This place tries to pride itself on upholding human rights and the rule of law but unfortunately the Parliament only recognises certain countries’ human rights when it is safe to condemn individual countries or persons for political reasons.’ Sadly, thanks to the unfortunate legacy of Nelson Mandela, it is too difficult and ideologically impossible to question its future, its human rights abuses and the lack of rule of law.”
The Independent MEP went on: “As the ANC loses support, many of their supporters are chillingly turning to the Marxist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) who advocate wholesale nationalisation, black empowerment by seizure of land and assets and violence against the whites and other minorities.
Read More:

Saturday, February 24, 2018


THE ROAD TO dystopia is paved with errors. It winds and undulates, and its off ramps include avoidable catastrophes like Madmaximum, where a boneheaded energy policy un-terraforms Earth, and the suburban nightmare of the Handmaid’s Vale, with all its orderly fascism. But honestly, the destination that freaks me out the most is the collection of gleaming, phallic glass spires that comprise Oligopolis, where corporations and the rich own everything. Including the beach.
I’ll be more specific. On February 22, the venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, co-founder of Sun Microsystems with a net worth reported at $2.4 billion, petitioned the US Supreme Court to let him close off the road from Highway 1 to a stretch of Northern California beach property he bought in 2009 for $34 million. Sheltered by a couple of cliffs, Martins Beach is 89 acres of beautiful white sand and a couple dozen rental cottages. When the conditions are right, the surfing’s pretty good.
According to beachgoers, Khosla started locking a gate on the road down to the beach that had almost always remained open. Years of lawsuits followed. Was Khosla allowed to paint over the sign indicating the way to the beach? Could he charge people more to park in a lot on the property? Could he close it off altogether? Courts at the county and state level all agreed: No.
The arguments were about more than just Khosla's beach. They were about all the beaches in the state—and maybe beyond. In California, “the rule of thumb is, if the sand is wet, the public has a right to be there. Anything above that, the property owner can exclude you,” says Jon Christensen of the UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, and a co-author of a 2017 report on beach access. “The Coastal Commission and Coastal Conservancy have, for 40-plus years now, made it a major priority to protect that access by protecting existing easements, existing paths, and existing roads that provide access for people to the beach and the coast.”
Read More:

The Social Costs of Sodomy

Here are some stats on how much homosexuals enrich our society:
-They make up approximately 3% of the population but account for 25%-40% of all child molestation cases.
-They make up over 80% of all male child molestation cases and the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.
-Homosexuals account for almost half of all serial killers and child killers, no surprise due to their fragile mental state.
-Most child molesters, child rapists, murderers and serial killers are male. Homosexual males account for 1% to 2% of the population. That means 1% to 2% of the population commit 1/3 of child molestations, 1/3 to 2/3 of child rapes, 1/2 of all murders, and more than 2/5 of serial murders.
-Homos have a disproportionate representation in all media (Hollywood, TV, Stage).
-Children of homosexual parents are twice as likely to have emotional instability than with children from normal parents.
In 2014 alone, gays aged 13-24 accounted for 92% of new GRIDS diagnoses in their age group
-Over half the people affected with HIV are homosexuals
-Blind surveys reveal a gross number of homos that admit to sexual contact with a minor

Read More:

WATCH: NRA's Wayne LaPierre speaks at CPAC

Terminated by PayPal. Also a New Mailbox by Kevin MacDonald

Well, it finally happened. I never understood why it took so long, but PayPal has finally bounced TOO as part of the campaign against the Alt Right and truth-telling generally, presumably pressured by the usual suspects. The PayPal buttons have been taken off the donations page, and recurring donations will not go through.
We are trying to figure out what to do next (suggestions appreciated), but in the meantime your continued support is very important. Right now the only way to donate is to send a check or money order to our new mailbox:
The Occidental Observer
1750 Delta Waters Rd Suite 102, #374
Medford, OR 97504

Donors who had a recurring donation via check distribution companies need to change the address, as the old mailbox in California will no longer be working.
Thanks for all the support we have received. This will definitely not shut us down.
Read More:

FBI Privilege

Slavery: An Instrument of White Guilt - Mark Collett

Multiculturalism has FAILED: How to Successfully Manage Diversity

Friday, February 23, 2018

Quantified JQ: Grasping ZOG by the Horns ANATOLY KARLIN

Are you an anti-Semite? Wonder no longer! Take the poll here:
Am I an anti-Semite? The SPLC and RationalWiki both seem to think so. But there are also those who believe I am a hasbara shill, or even Jewish myself. Either way, I don’t appear to be a particularly enthusiastic philo/anti-Semitic propagandist – of the 1,200+ posts to date at my archive, only about 15 are actually mainly about Jews (and I hope this will be the last one for some time).
Percentage anti-Semites according to the ADL (i.e. believe in 6+/11 of popular stereotypes about Jews).
Fortunately, the ADL has attempted to make at least a minimal attempt at quantification. You qualify as an anti-Semite if you answer Probably True to six or more of the following questions:
  1. Jews are more loyal to Israel than to [this country/to the countries they live in]
  2. Jews have too much power in the business world
  3. Jews have too much power in international financial markets
  4. Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust
  5. Jews don’t care what happens to anyone but their own kind
  6. Jews have too much control over global affairs
  7. Jews have too much control over the United States government
  8. Jews think they are better than other people
  9. Jews have too much control over the global media
  10. Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars
  11. People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave
In this post I will try to systemically answer each of these statements, but before I finalize my excommunication from ZOG, there’s a couple of caveats that I wish to make.
First, many of these combine an observation – often a statistically correct one – with a normative judgment. Of course Jews have many more billionaires and elite journalists per capita than any other major ethnicity. Is this good or bad – or even more ambiguously, “too much”? Difficult to say. For a committed blank slatist, the answer should be “Probably True”. Hence, the “anti-Semitism” of the more honest and consistent Leftists. Then again, knowledge of race differences in IQ, and the correlation of IQ with economic success, explains most if not all of the residual. But even though it annuls many of the more extreme anti-Semitic arguments, this form of argumentation is itself racist – and ironically, it was overwhelmingly Jews, e.g. Franz Boas, Leon Kamin, Gould, Lewontin, etc. – to a degree disproportionate even to their IQ advantage – who developed the modern blank slatism that tabooed such perspectives (although I have mixed opinions about his work, I think Kevin McDonald demonstrates this pretty conclusively). In other words, it was the Jews themselves who torpedoed the single most succinct and powerful argument against anti-Semitism; hence, also, the “anti-racist” IQ denialism amongst some of the more overt anti-Semites. Very amusing and ironic.
Read More:

FEDS REPORT DIVERSITY-VISA IMMIGRATION FROM AFRICA EXPLODED. From 29% of program's total to 50% during Obama years.

Immigration from Africa to the United States under the diversity visa lottery program exploded over the last two decades, surging from 29 percent of the program’s total immigrant population in 1995 to up to 50 percent during the Obama years, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service.
The report, “Diversity Immigrants’ Regions and Countries of Origin: Fact Sheet,” by immigration policy analyst Jill Wilson, explains the purpose of the program was to “provide an avenue for immigration from countries other than the major sending countries of current immigrants.”
In 1995, 47 percent of the program’s immigrants were from Europe and 17 percent from Asia, with fractional amounts from other locales.
In the most recent year for which reports are available, 2016, just 24 percent were from Europe and 31 percent from Asia.
 Enacted in 1990, the program accounts for about 5 percent of all immigrants.
Six global geographic regions are defined, and the law limits each country to no more than 7 percent of the total.
Read More:


The purpose of the recent "Black" Cheddar Man story was all too evident. 

Telling us that the oldest known inhabitant of the British Isles was Black was an obvious way of promoting a multicultural society of open borders and cheap labour, a combination that clearly suited the interests of the capitalists and landlords. It also had some synergy with the recent engagement of Prince Harry to a "Black" divorced actress.

Another obvious point was that the story was tied to a Channel 4 TV documentary about Cheddar Man. The publicity that it generated was a great way of boosting ratings for a dull documentary that would have otherwise struggled to attract advertising revenue. 

These facts made the Alt-Right justly suspicious of the so-called "science" involved in the story. Although, even if Cheddar Man had been Black, it would have meant nothing, merely showing that modern Britons had evolved skin more adapted to their environment or come along at a later date and replaced more primitive early inhabitants like Cheddar Man -- probably violently.

Now it seems that our suspicions were justified with an increasing number of scientists casting doubt on the "Black" Cheddar Man narrative, as reported by the highly respected New Scientist magazine (paywall):
"A Briton who lived 10,000 years ago had dark brown skin and blue eyes. At least, that’s what dozens of news stories published this month – including our own – stated as fact. But one of the geneticists who performed the research says the conclusion is less certain, and according to others we are not even close to knowing the skin colour of any ancient human."
The problem with Cheddar Man is that the main researcher on the project, Susan Walsh at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis -- yes, I've never heard of it either --was using a highly speculative model that was attempting to "predict" someone’s eye, hair, and skin pigmentation solely from their DNA. 

This unproved new method suggested that Cheddar Man may have had "dark" skin, which Channel 4's PR then spun to the media as  " definitely black." 

There are additional problems with Walsh's model in this case, as it has only ever been partially demonstrated with fresh DNA.

Read More:

Who Is The Aggressor In Syria?

Banned again from Facebook

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Kids: Then and Now by Fred Reed

OK, so why is the country falling apart? Specifically, why are kids blowing each other away? America has become a source of wonder the world over with its Columbines and hundreds and hundreds of dead in Chicago and Baltimore and its burning cities and riots. Other advanced countries don’t do these things.
America didn’t either until recently.   Why now? Something has changed, or some things. What?  People under under forty have never seen the country when it was sane. Let me point out things that have changed, at risk of sounding like a boilerplate cadger: “By cracky, wen I was a boy, we could amuse ourselves for hours with just a piece of string and a couple of sticks.” Let’s compare today with the Fifties and Sixties. I mean this as sociology, not nostalgisizing.
I think that a combination of social changes have led to tremendous stress on today’s kids that my generation did not suffer. To wit:
In my rural Virginia school, there was no racial tension. We were all white: teachers, students, parents.
The black kids went to their own school, Ralph Bunche. We had virtually no contact with each other. There was no hostility, just no contact. The academic gap didn’t exist in the absence of contact. Inintegration would prove cruel when it came. and the black kid s sank to the bottom. The causes can be argued, but the fact cannot.
There was no black crime to speak of or, as far as I knew any black crime. Certainly blacks did not shoot each other, or anybody. Neither did we. The reasons I suspect were similar.
Divorce was extremely rare, so we all had parents. Whether it is better that unhappy couples stay together or that they divorce can be argued, but they then did stay together. It made a large difference in outcomes if one accepts the statistics. The welfare programs of the Great Society had not yet destroyed the black family, which I speculate accounted in part for low crime.
Read More:

Jared Taylor Cannot Win with Facts and Reason Alone - Vision of Future trumps View of Reality - Richard Spencer’s Vision Needs to Smoke Less Crack

There are two prominent figures in the alternative sphere of the rightist spectrum. There is Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer. 

Jared Taylor makes good sense backed with facts and logic on a host of issues, but he lacks the vision thing. After all, Moses didn’t manage to lead all those Hebrews out of Egypt just by noticing facts around him. He inspired his people with the vision of a better tomorrow and the Promised Land. He promised them the laws of God on the conviction that God, the one and only God, was on their side. Without such prophecy, neither the mythical Moses nor the historical Muhammad could have achieved what they did. We may learn a lot from someone who points to things around us and gives a factual analysis of every item. But we aren’t likely to be inspired by him or look to him for The Truth, the one that lends meaning, purpose, and direction to our lives. Rather, it is the man who points to the distant horizon and speaks of the great future that inspires people and make them want to follow him. He is the prophet who is far-sighted, whereas the ‘factualists’ are short-sighted. 

We need all the fact-based people we can find as they get things done in the world, but the future is made by those who lead the people to ‘another’ world. This another world could be literal in the sense of discovering or conquering a distant territory. Or it could be a vision of how our own land could be transformed into something far greater. 
Now, Jared Taylor does have a passion and objective of sorts. He is passionately committed to his own race, culture, and heritage. And he looks forward to a world where whites will be safe and secure in identity and posterity. But it doesn’t excite or inspire because the Taylor’s vision of a good society is all about the A-B-C’s of stability. If he could have a Father-Knows-Best-like society for his own people, he would be content, and that would be that. Such a society would certainly be nice, but it’s not visionary enough to inspire masses of white people to view it as their Promised Land. To inspire the masses, the vision must be more than something nice or something-that-had-been. It has to be something that has yet to be, something so great, wondrous, and glorious. It needn’t be something as fanciful(and ridiculous) as Wakanda, but the vision has to be powerful enough to turn people into zealots and true believers who are willing to kill and die for this vision. 

Read More: