Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Paris: Urbanism Done Too Well?

Ivanka pushes female empowerment

YouTube Admits Censoring Independent News Channels

Ivanka pushes female empowerment

Blacks Launch 'Cain and Abel' Memorial Project in Columbus, Georgia to Stop Black on Black Homicide Epidemic

Lost in the hilarious madness of the decline of the National Football League (NFL), entirely because white fans are turning off a professional sport where black millionaires are taking a knee during our national anthem, is what's happening in Columbus, Georgia. 

In this 43 percent white city (45 percent black), violent crime is entirely a black problem. Located roughly 60 miles from Atlanta, Columbus is a dystopia, where black crime has reached biblical proportions. ['Cain and Abel' project launch fights black-on-black crime,, 9-24-17]:
As founder of the Columbus Black History Museum, Johnnie Warner noticed a disturbing trend in the black community. 
"... Prior to the end of the Civil Rights Movement, there were so many lynchings and killings of the black males by the whites," he said. "And here we are now, we're still living in fear - but because of us."
First off, this isn't a proper Afrocentric view of the Holy Bible... 
To address the issue, Warner launched a "Cain and Abel" memorial project in 2016 to denounce black-on-black crime in the community. He started by collecting the name of every local black person killed by someone of their race from January 2013 to December 2015. The list has 57 names. 
But it doesn't include those killed among the 26 homicides of 2016, or the 26 homicides that the Columbus Police Department has already recorded for 2017. 
Muscogee Coroner Buddy Bryan puts the number at 32, because he does not differentiate between a homicide that police consider a murder and one they categorize as manslaughter or a justifiable shooting. 

Read More:

How America Became the “Pressure-Cooker” Nation by John Horvat

The left is politicizing our calming safety-valve institutions—the national anthem, marriage, statues, even leisure—damning them as expressions of an oppressive regime that must be overthrown. But these institutions need to be defended in order to relieve the pressures that are mounting and tearing society apart…
If there is an image that represents the present state of the nation, it might be a pressure cooker. Such cooking devices are not much used in these microwave days of instant everything. The hermetically-sealed appliance uses steam pressure to penetrate foods and cook them quickly with a lower loss of vitamin or minerals associated with normal boiling. The key to successful pressure cooking is the proper functioning of the safety valve that can release excess steam and prevent explosions.
The situation inside America today is very much like a pressure cooker. The powerful forces involved in today’s events and debates build up pressure that quickly penetrates into the culture and political arena. As the conflicts between the diverse factions increase, the pressure is reaching dangerously high levels.
The Need for Safety Values
Differences are natural to the political life of any nation. People, groups, and political parties will always disagree on some issues. However, there are usually shared principles, symbols, ideals, or even pastimes or places that serve as safety values to alleviate the inevitable frictions of living life in common. Every society needs safety valve institutions to serve as outlets for pent-up energy or emotion.
The problem today is that these safety-value institutions are under attack everywhere. In fact, they are now deliberately thrown into the pressurized debate and not allowed to function as they should. It is an explosive situation.


A man who liked dressing up in brown shirts and lederhosen, and posing with swastikas and Nazi crap, has turned out to be not only gay but also Jewish, effectively ticking both boxes of the majority of those who like LARPing as (((Nazis))). 

The man in question is Kevin Wilshaw, formerly a member of the National Front, a British nationalist party that was heavily infiltrated by government spies and destabilised from within, with the help of LARPers like Wilshaw, who helped to provide the kind of "bad optics" that put "normies" off voting in their own best interests, and allowed mass immigration and multiculturalism in Britain to reach toxic levels. 

The revelations were made after Wilshaw renounced the party he had helped sabotage in an attempt to climb on the "anti-nationalism" gravy train. 

Wilshaw was a National Front organiser in the 1980s and was still active earlier this year when he would speak at events. 

He said he is disowning the movement and leaving the National Front because, as a gay, Jewish, he simply doesn't feel the party is Nazi enough for his tastes anymore. 

Gay and Jewish men have a long history of being strongly attracted to (((Nazi LARPy))) stuff and any groups or parties that indulge this strange fetish. This even goes back to the original Nazis who were riddled with gays, while later (((Neo-Nazi))) movements, which were often designed to discredit White nationalism, had more than their fair share of Jews, which still surprises a lot of normies.

Read More:

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Political Violence Is Inevitable In America

The future looks like it has a lot of Balkanization and political violence in it.
The shooting in Las Vegas is part and parcel now of living in the West. Nowhere in the West is it more evident now than in America that the many racial and ethnic groups are fighting over a carcass. A dead bag of ideas and principles that has been festering since at least 1965.
The many ethnic and racial groups that comprise modern America are scavenging at this carcass in a desperate frenzy to grasp what resources from it that they can and as those resources begin to run out it will lead to confrontation and conflict.
The country is on the edge of a radical conflict that will change the very geopolitical and demographic makeup of the North American continent. The old America of 1965 is dead and it’s time her former peoples go their separate ways to forge a new existence apart from one another.
If the people who formerly used to call themselves Americans continue to fight over this carcass they will spark this aforementioned conflict and blood will be spilled. We see now that African Americans are ‘taking the knee’ to protest a country which they feel has treated them as second-class citizens throughout various points in history.
They have the right to feel this way.
According to nearly 43% of African Americans don’t believe America will make the changes necessary to give them equality. Meanwhile, affirmative action and massive welfare programs to re-distribute the nation’s wealth have remained in place for over half a century in an attempt to lift up Black America. Still, 66% of Blacks feel that they are treated less fairly when applying for a home loan and 75% are under the impression they are treated unfairly in the criminal justice system, a system which was purposely built to be the least biased in the world. Because of this perception of their situation, they have begun to demand change that not even they themselves believed  White Americans would give them.
Read More:

Harvey Weinstein: Jews Need to be “As Organized as the Mafia”

This is a priceless article from 2015, well worth re-reading. One notorious Jewish con man accepts a humanitarian award named after another notorious Jewish con man, Simon Wiesenthal.

“We better stand up and kick these guys in the ass,” movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said about present-day anti-Semites as he accepted the Humanitarian Award at the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s National Tribute Dinner on Tuesday night at the Beverly Hilton. “We’re gonna have to get as organized as the mafia,” he continued. “We just can’t take it anymore [from] these crazy bastards.”
At the conclusion of a ceremony that celebrated four Jewish and gentile heroes (several posthumously), and at which more than a dozen Holocaust survivors were asked to stand and be applauded, Weinstein was introduced by his longtime friend and competitor Jeffrey Katzenberg — the event’s master of ceremonies — and Christoph Waltz. The actor has twice won the best supporting actor Oscar for roles in Weinstein films, the first time for portraying a Nazi in Inglourious Basterds. Weinstein said to hearty applause, “Too bad movies can’t all be like Inglourious Basterds, where Hitler gets what he deserves.” 
Weinstein, 63, then went off-script to speak about his father, who was a sergeant stationed in Cairo during World War II. The elder Weinstein aided the Haganah (the precursor to the IDF before Israel was a state) and later taught his sons about anti-Semitism. Weinstein emphasized his concern about anti-Semitism around the world, which Wiesenthal Center studies indicate is at its highest levels since the end of World War II.
Read More:

Thursday, October 12, 2017

The fellas are driving people crazy in Kansas City and Wilmington. Again

Were The Founding Fathers 'Racist'? | Jared Taylor

Why the Alt-Right Will Win

Lessons from the Harvey Weinstein Debacle

Try as we might it’s impossible to avoid Harvey Weinstein. Initial reports of a couple of instances of sexual harassment have now metastasized into multiple reports of innumerable instances of sexual assault and even rape. One will be forgiven for hoping that Weinstein be brought before the bar of justice for his actions. We are well beyond improprieties. Many of the actions seem more like felonies. Hopefully, prosecutors will no longer be cowed by an entertainment mogul.

For the record Ronan Farrow’s long expose in the New Yorker yesterday seems to have tipped the scales beyond the point of recovery. Farrow’s article is clear and well-written. Congratulations to him. Of course, he is also Woody Allen’s son… though no one seems to want to mention the point. For the record, we also congratulate the New York Times for breaking the story.

True enough, as we and others have opined, the story's appearance must have something to do with the fact that Weinstein is nearly washed up. Still, the liberal outrage machine has taken a very big hit… and it was not generated by Fox News.

Among the salient observations, the Weinstein debacle has cast a serious pall on the virtue signaling of Hollywood celebrities. These progressive icons, ever at the ready to chastise anyone on the other side of the political divide with gross immorality, have now been exposed as self-righteous hypocrites, perfectly willing to trade sex for power and to allow a score of young actresses to be sexually abused by an entertainment mogul. As happened in the case of Bill Clinton they condone sexual harassment when the perpetrator is one of their own. Progressive men are not just given a pass. They are given free access to young women... to do as they please. This much Harvey Weinstein understood.

Unable to defend members of their own community, self-righteous feminists are in serious moral trouble. Of course, they do not know enough to know how much trouble they’re in, but time will tell them.

Beyond The Wall 41: King of Pol

To directly download this episode click here

In this episode we had the great pleasure of chatting with King of Pol, of Gamergate fame. We talk about his involvement in the Gamergate movement, what he thinks about it, what happened to it and of course many many more topics with our distinct and patented High Effort Shitposting style.

In the taco stand we have: Cavernario and Paul; Special Guest: King of Pol

King of Pol's Twitch because his twitter got shoah'd: oy vey

Mexican Black Hawk gunship action
CIA runs the drug business
Abby Martin on Joe Rogan
Pedos in Hollywood

Read More:

Julius Evola and the Rebirth of Radical Traditionalism

Arktos announces our campaign to publish English editions of four of Evola's previously untranslated works in the coming six months.

About this project

Arktos is proud to be one of the forefront publishers of the seminal Traditionalist philosopher, Julius Evola. Despite Evola’s key importance to Traditionalism, many of his books still remain untranslated. We are excited to announce our campaign to publish English editions of four of these previously untranslated works in the coming six month period.

The books we plan to publish are:

Recognitions — Julius Evola’s final book, this collection of forty brief but trenchant and uncompromising essays encapsulates the author’s rich and varied career. Evola here touches on most of the major themes to which he dedicated his life’s work, presenting his final formulations on some of the key figures and problems of our times. The result is a masterful survey of past, present, and future, indispensable as a reference for those familiar with Evola, and ideal as an introduction for those new to him.

The Bow and the Club — This rich collection of essays from Evola’s final period covers wide and fertile ground in the fields of culture and politics. From spiritual initiation to the questions of race and homosexuality, from modernity to the Tradition, from a ruthless critique of contemporary vulgarity to the investigation of the glory of the past, the topics treated are both exceptionally relevant to our times and of transcendent value in themselves.

The Myth of the Blood — A magisterial overview of the problem of human races, The Myth of the Blood follows the development of the concept of race from antiquity to modern times. Working from historical, mythical, scientific, and philosophical perspectives, the author confronts a notoriously difficult issue with a most uncommon mixture of fearlessness, fairness, and erudition.

Read More:

‘Blade Runner 2049’: A Mexican in Los Angeles - Steve Sailer

Blade Runner 2049 is a remarkably faithful sequel/tribute to the old noir science-fiction cult film. Although set in Los Angeles’ snowy summer of 2049, thirty years after the first movie’s rainy autumn of 2019, it audaciously replicates most of the crowd-displeasing traits of that famous box office flop.
Denis Villeneuve, the French-Canadian director of Sicario and Arrival, is a competent successor to Sir Ridley Scott. If you loved the original Blade Runner, you’ll likely like the new one.
Much as the old one, the new Blade Runner 2049 is a slow-moving, visually magnificent but also oppressive, highbrow, vaguely Christological ambiguous allegory featuring a star in his prime (Harrison Ford then, Ryan Gosling now) giving a flat performance.
To be honest, though, not that many people actually enjoyed Blade Runner in 1982. For instance, embarrassingly, I didn’t. Yet, as I was watching the impressive new film slowly wear out its welcome, I was reminded once again that the first Blade Runner was perhaps more interesting to argue about than to see.
Please share this article:

Egor Kholmogorov: Socialism Not Dead - Paradoxes of an Unsolved Problem By ANATOLY KARLIN

The latest in our series of translations of Russian national-conservative thinker Egor Kholmogorov.
Translated by: Fluctuarius Argenteus; slightly edited by AK.

Socialism Not Dead: Paradoxes of an Unsolved Problem

It may seem strange that, at the turn of the 21st century, the word “Socialism” is back in the popular political idiom. The final decade of the preceding century seemed to have been the time of its complete (and, so it would seem, irreversible) annihilation.
Soviet-style “Real Socialism” ended in a pathetic disgrace, striking its colors at the sight of a sausage pointed at its heart. Who would have thought that churning out missiles, dams, and factories wouldn’t be enough to sustain a planned economy based on communal property? It was also necessary to grant the Socialist people access to consumer goods at least remotely comparable to those available under Capitalism; otherwise, falling behind not only in living standards but also in technology became inevitable. Soviet Socialism collapsed under the weight of this contradiction, while China enacted reforms so deep that, while looking at Chinese billionaires, one can’t help but wonder whether it’s still Socialism or a “Red Capitalist” oligarchy of the Chinese Communist Party – quite probably no worse than any other oligarchy in history.
Meanwhile, the Capitalist world with its triumphant Liberalism seemed to have scored a doubtless moral victory. Not only did it outpace Socialism, it completely consumed it. All more or less sensible Socialist ideas were incorporated into the structure of the “welfare state”, leaving “Real Socialism” with such dubious achievements as complete socialization of property or pedantic ideological censorship. Socialism appeared to have been entirely devoured and digested by a Capitalism that had reached in this struggle a new stage in its historical evolution.
A quarter of a century after this victory over Socialism, the foundations of the global Liberal order are more and more visibly shaken. Within the US Democratic party, Hillary Clinton’s Liberalism, oriented at racial and sexual minorities, has been challenged by “Democratic Socialist” Bernie Sanders who is cajoling White American workers into rising against the 1%, the Wall Street loan sharks. Socialist? US Presidential candidate? Early 21st century? It seems patently absurd. Meanwhile across the pond, the Labour party in the UK eschewed fine-looking bureaucrats in favour of Jeremy Corbyn, a Socialist, an anti-militarist, and general diehard Leftist. One of his first acts as leader of the Shadow Cabinet was creating a committee for a new economic policy, including such anti-inequality fighters as Thomas Piketty and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz.
All of a sudden, we not only see a ressurection of Socialism in two of the leading countries of the Capitalist world, but positioning itself as a powerful political political alternative to the dominant Liberal mainstream. If we take into account that this mainstream is also under attack by right-wing populism of the likes of Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen (the program of the latter replete with anti-Capitalist and anti-Globalist vocabulary), the Liberal “end of history” seems to have ended quite rapidly. If this wave hasn’t reached us yet, it is only because both our Liberalism and our Capitalism are quite peculiar, and our political system doesn’t operate under Western-style rules. However, one cannot completely shut oneself off from a revolution of ideas, and it seems likely we will soon hear the march of a new Socialism here in Russia.
What is the cause of this 2010s Socialist re-revolution? The return of economic conditions that had caused the heyday of Socialism in the 19th century and were drastically changed in the 20th. The driving force of the Socialism of two centuries ago was a contradiction between the ideals of civil liberty and equality brought about by the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, and an absolute economic inequality typical of ancien régime Europe. The latter became more prominent and intolerable at the start of the Industrial Revolution, when hundreds of thousands of proletarians became concentrated in the stench and stuffiness of the working-class suburbs of developed countries.

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Philip Girladi interview, Jewish Americans pushing Wars

Hollywood is Much Worse Than Harvey Weinstein by Andy Nowicki

Hollywood is Much Worse Than Weinstein

Mega Outbreak Of Anal Cancer Ravages LGBT- Doctors Announce: ‘This Is The Next Great LGBT Health Crisis & We Don’t Know How To Stop It’

HIV/AIDS was normalized in the LGBT community because, as they admit, are the prime transmitters of HIV and AIDS due to sexual practices such as sodomy. According to scientists, there is another major health crisis that is about to befall the LGBT and they have “no idea’ how to treat it, and that is an epidemic of anal cancer:
Almost 620,000 gay and bisexual men in the United States were living with HIV in 2014, and 100,000 of these men were not even aware of their infection. These men are 100 times more likely to have anal cancer than HIV-negative men who exclusively have sex with women. Yet, no national screening guidelines exist for anal cancer prevention in any population.
Anal cancer is predominantly caused by chronic or persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. HPV infection can lead to the development of anal precancer which, if remains undetected or not adequately treated, may lead to anal cancer. Likewise, HPV infection is also responsible for causing cervical, vaginal, vulvar, oropharyngeal, penile and rectal cancers.
The objective of screening is to identify and treat these precancers to prevent occurrence of anal cancer. However, one of the reasons for the lack of screening guidelines is that anal precancer treatment has not yet been shown to prevent invasive cancer. Our study, published today in the journal Cancer, attempts to find a possible solution to prevent anal cancer in HIV-positive gay and bisexual men, using the best available data. We found that age-specific anal precancer management, including post-treatment HPV vaccination, can potentially lead to an 80 percent decrease in lifetime risk of anal cancer and anal cancer mortality among gay and bisexual men.
Anal cancer: the next big crisis
Some in the medical community have identified anal cancer as the next big crisis among HIV-infected gay and bisexual men. Initiation of anti-retroviral therapy in the 1990s greatly reduced the AIDS-related death rate and improved survival. However, this improvement in survival led to an increase in the lifetime risk of developing anal cancer, especially among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men.

Why I Was Wrong About Brexit

Thursday, October 5, 2017

Wars for Israel Drive Mass Immigration into Europe

Christopher Cantwell AMA on AnCap podcast

White Liberalism Is Slowly Being Crushed By Type II Propaganda By ARTHUR GORDIAN

The recent spat between Jonathan Chait and Te-Nehsi Coates illustrates an interesting way that the Cathedral manages to control the narrative on issues through its stranglehold of the media. This issue serves as an illustration of another form of propaganda which permeates American culture, Type II or the false dichotomy. The actual dispute is rather droll, but a very brief summary is necessary.
Coates wrote an essay attacking the white liberals who place blame for Trump’s election on socioeconomic issues and the Democrats’ abandonment of the working class in favor of kulturkampf issues and urban upper-middle class priorities. He accused white liberals of attempting to dodge the blame for Trump by pawning responsibility onto the working class, so they can avoid the fact that Trump was elected on a platform of support for his white constituency.  Policies which Trump passed to benefit his constituents would also benefit white liberals, thus implicating them in a system which oppresses minorities and enshrines white supremacy. For that reason, white liberal journalists who wrote on socioeconomic and class-consciousness angles surrounding the Trump administration are participants in white supremacy because they benefit from Trump but attempt to disguise that fact, according to Coates.
Jonathan Chait responded in New York Magazine by referring to the Left’s “discourse of panic” surrounding Trump and the way that the term “white supremacist” had been so enlarged in the last year to include anyone who fails to show sufficient zeal for the Democratic Party’s agenda.  The result of this discourse, he argued, is that all opposition is lumped in with white supremacy and is therefore subject to violence and denial of political rights. He questioned if this principle will ultimately lead to all contrary opinions becoming invitations to physical attack.
In response to Chait’s article, Del Valle argued that Chait is giving cover to white supremacists on the Left, which she defines as any person advocating for “policies that harm people of color” and includes “polite white liberals who definitely don’t agree with neo-Nazis but will defend their right to chant ‘blood and soil’ on public property.” For Del Valle, Chait’s argument is an expression of his white supremacy and an attempt to dodge its consequences, part of the “two level” theory of white supremacy. This theory is outlined in Ian Hanley Lopez’s Dog Whistle Politics, in which overt white supremacy by Republicans is used to benefit covert white supremacists like liberal Democrats who maintain plausible deniability in order to profit from non-white constituencies. The debate continued on Twitter, including Jeet Heer and Damon Linker, with Chait himself getting into the mix.
Read More:

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

The Mess Before Maria - Steve Sailer

Puerto Rico is a test case of whether nationalism is as dispensable as the heightening conventional wisdom assumes.
Puerto Rico possesses many of the attributes assumed to represent the utopian post-national future, such as open borders with the United States, diversity, and a lack of national sovereignty.
Yet, as demonstrated once again by the current post-hurricane crisis of electricity outages, in part caused by the power company failing to trim trees, Puerto Rico is instead a pit of corruption and fecklessness.
Obviously, U.S. taxpayers will wind up paying to turn the electricity back on. But Puerto Rico is illuminating about the long-run sustainability of any system not based on national sovereignty and accountability.
Nobody washes a rented car and nobody treats Puerto Rico like it’s his or her own country.
For instance, the island has unbelievably ineffective public schools. Puerto Rican students in the United States are not terribly high-scoring, of course, but Puerto Rican public-school test scores are abysmal. On the federal 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress test (in Spanish and specifically designed for Puerto Rico), zero percent of island public-school eighth graders scored at either the Advanced or Proficient levels. Six percent scored Basic, and a staggering 94 percent performed Below Basic, the lowest tier.
Please share this article:

/pol/ Will Be the END of 4chan

Sunday, October 1, 2017

Grace & Steel Ep. 92 - A Consideration of Zoe Quinn's Memoir

September Diary: Was Fulk the Black A Badder Badwhite Than Richard Spencer?; the Russians Have A Word for Goodwhites; Etc. By JOHN DERBYSHIRE

As deplorable as we Badwhites are, our medieval forebears were deplorabler.

Here’s one: Geoffrey le Barbu (“the Bearded”), Count of Anjou, around a.d. 1065:
The bishopric of Séez was vacant; by feudal custom the lord, Count Geoffrey, might appoint the next bishop; but by strict canon law, which was increasing in influence, the chapter of Séez, without lay interference, should fill the vacancy by election. This they did, in defiance of the count; whereupon he ordered all the canons to be castrated, and with them the bishop-elect. [Devil’s Brood by Alfred Duggan, Chapter 1.]
Now that’s Badwhite! (Geoffrey, by the way, was a great-granduncle of the English King Henry II, first of the Plantagenet Dynasty. His younger brother, who rejoiced in the epithet Fulk the Surly, was Henry’s great-grandfather.)
What got me thinking of Geoffrey was a conversation with a friend who’d been listening to an audio version of Bertrand Russell’s History of Western Philosophy.
In his introductory overview Russell points up the contrast between the rough, illiterate “kings and barons of Teutonic descent” who held secular power in medieval Europe and the churchmen who carried literate civilization forward, often — as the case of Geoffrey shows — in the teeth of fierce hostility from the fighting, drinking, hunting, bishop-castrating secular lords.
Of those lords Russell writes:
The Church could never produce in them the quiet regularity of good behaviour which a modern employer demands, and usually obtains, of his employees. What was the use of conquering the world if they could not drink and murder and love as the spirit moved them? And why should they, with their armies of proud knights, submit to the orders of bookish men, vowed to celibacy and destitute of armed force?
All the armed force was on the side of the kings, and yet the Church was victorious. The Church won, partly because it had almost a monopoly of education, partly because the kings were perpetually at war with each other …
Is not this (my friend asked) somewhat parallel to our own Cold Civil War? Are not our own gentry liberal Goodwhites “bookish men … destitute of armed force?” (“Vowed to celibacy” doesn’t fit; although given the goodwhite-badwhite birthrate differential, from a strictly Darwinian viewpoint, it might as well.)
Read More: